| Identifying the Argument of an Essay |
Spotting the Reasons in the Editorial (Fourth Page)
Let's make this summary a visual summary so we can see it better:
| Conclusion: | The federal government should not dictate athletics schedules. |
| (Because)
Someone complained.
|
|
|
(Because)
The federal nanny is meddling again.
(Because)
1. The government
demanded that
they
sign the 1993 agreement.
2. The
government extended its
demands.
3. The
government imposed a fine.
This is what the argument
structure looks like so far. Notice the "cascade effect" that many longer arguments exhibit:
The federal government should not dictate athletics schedules
BECAUSE this is meddling in local affairs
BECAUSE the following examples are examples of
meddling:
1)
the federal government demanded they sign the
agreement
[meddling], and
2)
the federal government made additional demands
[meddling]
and
3)
the federal government imposed a fine [meddling].
The conclusion is supported by one reason which in turn is
supported by others and so on.
Please note that there is a value
assumption ( an
unstated value judgement ) which must
be accepted along with the reason ( the federal government is
meddling again in local
affairs ) if that reason is to support the conclusion. The
value assumption is the following:
meddling in local
affairs by the federal government is a bad thing.
Let's continue now with paragraph 4 on the next page.
Summary | Previous | Next |
Editorial
| Edit-Spotting Conclusion | Edit-Spotting
Reasons(1),(2),(3)
MCC Home | Comm/Humanities
Home |
Philosophy Home | Faculty
Pages
| On-line Courses | Courses |
Student Essays | Area
Philosophy Departments | Philosophy Resources | Philosophy
of Technology
|
Philosophy of Education | Philosophy
and Multiculturalism | Philosophy
and Learning College | Web
Authoring Resources | Libraries |
Metropolitan
Community College
Omaha,
Nebraska
Last revision: June 6,1998
Send comments or additional
sites to Frank Edler fedler@mccneb.edu