
Formats
for Papers

I. Critique Paper
A. Introductory
paragraph: introduce the topic and the issue about the
topic you'll be addressing in your paper. State the main
claim
(conclusion) you are making about the issue. You may also
wish to indicate briefly to the reader how you are going
to proceed in your paper.
B. Body:
(1) present a
summary of the opposing argument (give the
conclusion and the main reasons).
(2) evaluate the
argument you have just presented: evaluate each of
the reasons for the opposing arguments. Do the reasons
support the conclusion well? Is sufficient evidence
brought forth to support the conclusion? Is the
conclusion generalized from only a few examples? Is the
evidence documented? Is the evidence mere assertion (mere
opinion)? Is there ambiguity in the language of the
reasons which affects the ability of the reason to
support the conclusion? Are there hidden assumptions
which are left out of the argument?
(3) present the
argument for your main claim. Is there evidence
neglected by the opposition that supports your position?
Are there good consequences to your position which
outweigh the opposition? Is there a value which supports
your side which is more important than the values of the
opposition? Do certain basic rights support your position
more than the opposition?
C. Concluding
paragraph: Repeat your conclusion as something proven
and briefly show why it's so important.
II.
Comparison-and-Contrast Paper
A. Introductory
paragraph: introduce the topic and the issue of your paper. State your main
claim (conclusion) or position in relation to the
issue. Since this kind of paper is a bit more complex
than the critique paper, it may be a good idea to tell
the reader briefly that you will be comparing and
contrasting two things (whatever they are, be sure to
identify them) in the body of your paper.
B. Body:
(1) give a brief summary of the two
arguments/positions you are comparing and contrasting.
(2) present all the
similarities between the two arguments or positions (or
you could compare the strengths of both arguments or
positions).
(3) present all
the differences between the two arguments or positions (or
you could present all the weaknesses of both arguments or
positions).
(4) after the
comparing and contrasting both positions, present your own
view (your conclusion) on the issue and give
reasons why you think it is the better position. You
could take one of the positions that you've just compared
and contrasted or a combination of both, or you could
take an alternate position.
C. Concluding
paragraph: restate your position and briefly show why
it's so important.
MCC Home | Comm/Humanities Home | Philosophy
Home | Faculty
Pages | On-line
Courses | Courses
|
Student
Essays | Area
Philosophy Departments | Philosophy Resources | Philosophy
of Technology |
Philosophy
of Education | Philosophy
and Multiculturalism | Philosophy and Learning College | Web
Authoring
Resources | Libraries |
Metropolitan
Community College
Omaha,
Nebraska
Last revision:
May 13, 1999
Send comments
or additional sites to Frank Edler fedler@mccneb.edu
|